Management Best Way to Manage

Question: Write about theManagementfor Best Way to Manage. Answer: The area of management is a very vast area. In recent times, organizations have realized the importance of management and leadership. With the forces of globalization, Internet and e-commerce, organizations have expanded in different parts of the world. The differences in the cultures has further shifted the focus on effective management. Therefore, it is important that the organizations should be in strong hands. the senior people or the leaders should be able to manage the team and employees in an effective and efficient manner as employees productivity could be directly linked with the leadership or management. There are various ways to manage a team. The manager or the leader can use autocratic style or democratic style (Carriger, 2016). The leaders can also use servant leadership or situational leadership. There is true difference between leading and managing and being able to see how this could negatively affect the individuals in the team can determine the success of organizat ions. The initial research suggests that the best way to manage the team depends on number of factors. The best way to manage depends on the expectations of employees, perception of investors, the financial condition of the organization, market and industry conditions, etc. Today, the focus of managers is on decision making as often, tough decisions have to be made (Costanza Groot, 2014). There has to be tough decisions made in order to ensure safety for all employees including managers. Everyone should be on board and make choices that are for the best and offers a better solution to the problems at hand.When a change has to come quick, sometime management fails at its attempt to implement the change correctly. The ways to manage can entirely depend on the personality of leaders. That is a difficult question for me, I want to be a leader I believe I can be a very successful leader. I unfortunately tend to manage more often than not. I need to learn to trust my team to make the decisions and to manage themselves. Being both overwhelms me and I feel like I forget to cover everything when I try to do everything. I am learning as I go through the courses how to be successful at both and to choose one or the other and to stick with my choice.Simply stated, it can be said that the best way to manage is one where employees could see themselves engaged. The best way to manage can entirely change among different corporations. The large organizations like Wal-Mart may not be in a position to give complete freedom to employees. However, a small organization or a start-up can do that. Likewise, the organizations like Apple, that gives complete focus on employees innovation may want to manage employees differently than Wal-Mart that gives complete focus on processes and procedures (Carpenter Berry, 2014). In fact, within an organization itself, the best way to manage can differ. There could be some leader that wants to manage its team in a more open way and at the same time, there could be some leader who prefer close system over open systems. Therefore, it can be said that there are number of internal and external factors that could decide the best course of management. an intelligent manager is one who is always flexible and open to change. A smart manager is one who can change his or her management style based on the team, organization, industry and expectations of different stakeholders. There are various ways to manage and there can be few ways to manage best. The leaders need to understand the best way to manage; however, the best way can differ. For example, in a difficult situation, some leaders would feel that situational leadership is best; while some other can feel that charismatic leadership is best. I personally believe that the best way to manage includes collaboration and integration with the people. The mechanism of feedback is also an integral part of best management skills (Antonakis House, 2013). The most valuable co-workers I have are those who will give me honest feedback. That may mean waiting till they can pull me aside--no one wants to be called out in front of a crowd! I also find that as relationships develop you get a sense from friends when you are stepping out of the box and can pull back your foot before it is too late. I have had the experience of feeling someone's unease with where I was going without them even saying anything. I was able to modify my behavior and in retrospect they were right and I was headed in the wrong direction. When I find people like that I latch on to them and try to build the relationship to benefit us both. Van der Voet (2014) argued that directive style of decision making could be the best management style. If the rules and the procedures are followed, then then time and money can be saved. but the biggest issue in this style of decision making is that rarely does the leader have all the pertinent information to make an effective decision. Other negative point is that the managers rely on their own information, knowledge, experience and judgment. One thing that comes to my mind about management is that leaders should not focus on micromanagement. Hokka Vahasantanen (2014) argued that that micromanagement is a sign of poor leadership. At times expectation setting, may seem like micromanagement but they are separate. Set out the expectations in as much detail as you like but a manager cannot control every detail of what people do. Managers have to set goals around measurable data, measure the data, and hold people accountable for how they measure up. This is often quite difficult to do. In contemporary business environment, the biggest measure of good manager is how the manager interacts with the employees. There are other important things like knowledge, time management, etc., but that bedside interaction is key. It is also very difficult to measure and very difficult to micromanage. There are managersand leaders that don'tunderstand or care about employees or followers needs, and choose not to understand them. Ethical decision makingand not abusingones power can create a positive climate and culture. For me personally, it is very difficult to understand how someone can be so inconsiderate and unprofessional to mess with another person lively hood without letting them know. Sometimes people allow personal opinions, or personal issues make their decisions for them.Working with leaders and managers that use these tactics can not only be challenging but unhealthy. As leaders and managers, we encounter different problems with different group of people. I think it is easy to use the authoritative style or directive style when the there is only one person who decides or if the decision maker has the power to make the decision. When there are facts, and rules and procedures to follow then managers can adopt descriptive style. In emergency situations, it is wiser to use authoritative style. Bolino Klotz (2013) argued that the best management style is one that includes various stakeholders while making any decision. A good or a best manager is one who looks after the interest and expectations of all the stakeholders. As a manager, I try very hard to take into account all perspectives, stakeholders, clients, mission and vision of the department and encourage and allow individuals to participate in the decision making in the office. We have over the past two years, had several meetings focused solely on gaining individuals feedback, creating a collab orative, innovative and experimental atmosphere and encouraging others to speak up and make the changes they believe would support the overall mission but allow for a happier work environment (Mohelska Sokolova, 2015). A combination of analytical and conceptual personal decision-making styles applies in this situation. In the analytical style, managers consider complex solutions based on as much data as they can gather. In a nut shell, it can be said that the style of management should be left open to managers (Newman Miao, 2016). There can certainly be more than one may to manage best. However, it is the dynamics between the managers and employees that should determine the best way of management. The leaders and managers can also learn from the style of other leaders. However, they should also give considerations to various internal factors when it comes to best suited style. References Antonakis, J. and House, R.J., 2013. The full-range leadership theory: The way forward. InTransformational and Charismatic Leadership: The Road Ahead 10th Anniversary Edition(pp. 3-33). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Bolino, M.C., Klotz, A.C., Turnley, W.H. and Harvey, J., 2013. Exploring the dark side of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(4), pp.542-559. Carriger, M.S., 2016. What is the best way to develop new managers? Problem-based learning vs. lecture-based instruction.The International Journal of Management Education,14(2), pp.92-101. Carpenter, N.C., Berry, C.M. and Houston, L., 2014. A meta?analytic comparison of self?reported and other?reported organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(4), pp.547-574. Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S.J., Kubiszewski, I., Farber, S. and Turner, R.K., 2014. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services.Global Environmental Change,26, pp.152-158. Hokka, P. and Vahasantanen, K., 2014. Agency-centred couplinga better way to manage an educational organization?.International Journal of Leadership in Education,17(2), pp.131-153. Mohelska, H. and Sokolova, M., 2015. Organisational culture and leadershipjoint vessels?.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,171, pp.1011-1016. Newman, A., Miao, Q., Hofman, P.S. and Zhu, C.J., 2016. The impact of socially responsible human resource management on employees' organizational citizenship behaviour: the mediating role of organizational identification. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(4), pp.440-455. Van der Voet, J., 2014. The effectiveness and specificity of change management in a public organization: Transformational leadership and a bureaucratic organizational structure.European Management Journal,32(3), pp.373-382.